Resignation Statement to Parliament
delivered 9 September 2019, Palace of Westminster, London, UK
[AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio]
Colleagues, I would like to make a personal statement to the House.
At the 2017 election, I promised my wife and children that it would be my last. This is a pledge that I intend to keep.
If the House votes tonight for an early general election, my tenure as Speaker and MP will end when this Parliament ends.
If the House does not so vote, I have concluded that the least disruptive and most democratic course of action would be for me to stand down at the close of business on Thursday, October the 31st.
"Least disruptive" because that date will fall shortly after the votes on the Queen’s Speech expected on 21st and 22nd October. The week or so after that may be quite lively and it would be best to have an experienced figure in the chair for that short period.
"Most democratic" because it will mean that a ballot is held when all members have some knowledge of the candidates. This is far preferable to a contest at the beginning of a parliament, when new MPs will not be similarly informed and may find themselves vulnerable to undue institutional influence.
We would not want anyone to be whipped senseless, would we?
Throughout my time as speaker, I have sought to increase the relative authority of this legislature for which I will make absolutely no apology to anyone, anywhere, at any time. To deploy a perhaps dangerous phrase: I have also sought to be the Backbenchers’ Backstop.1
I could not do so without the support of a small but superb team in Speakers’ House: the wider House staff; my Buckingham constituents; and above all, my wife Sally and our three children, Oliver, Freddie, and Jemima. From the bottom of my heart, I thank them all profusely.
I could also not have served without the repeated support of this House and its Members, past and present. This is a wonderful place filled overwhelmingly by people who are motivated by their notion of the national interest, by their perception of the public good, and by their duty not as delegates, but as representatives to do what they believe is right for our country.
We degrade this parliament at our peril.
I have served as a Member of parliament for 22 years and for the last ten as Speaker. This has been -- let me put it explicitly -- the greatest privilege and honor of my professional life, for which I will be eternally grateful. I wish my successor in the chair the very best fortune in standing up for the rights of honorable and right honorable Members, individually, and for parliament institutionally, as the Speaker of the House of Commons.
1 An allusion to and analogy from the "Irish Backstop" problem introduced during the Brexit negotiations. By analogy, just as the idea of hard geographic boundary lines governing lawful trade practices between the EU (via Ireland) and UK (via Northern Ireland) are unacceptably prejudicial, so too are the structural Parliamentary norms that govern who is and isn't allowed to speak in an "official" capacity. In opening up the floor to a more diverse array of speakers, including especially the "backbenchers," and further, allowing them to challenge more frequently higher ranking Members declared positions -- and often less declared special interests behind those positions -- Bercow effectively styled himself a rhetorical barrier breaker toward a more democratically-endowed Parliamentary order.
Original Audio and Video Source: parliamentlive.tv